|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution of Greek dialects in the classical period.[1]
Ancient Greek, in classical antiquity before the development of the Koiné (κοινή) as the lingua franca of Hellenism, was divided into several dialects. Likewise, Modern Greek is divided into several dialects, most of them deriving from the Koiné.
Provenance
Important authorsImportant authors for the individual dialects include Thucydides for Attic, Herodotus and Archilochos of Paros for Ionic, Alcman and Ibycus of Rhegium for Doric, Sappho and Alcaeus for Aeolic (Lesbian), Corinna of Tanagra for Boiotic. Thessalic and Arcado-Cypriot never became literary dialects and are only known from inscriptions, and to some extent by the comical parodies of Aristophanes. Epic Greek is a mixture of Aeolic, Doric and Attic-Ionic, according to Dion Chrysostomus; however, the "Doric" elements are not actually Doric but rather archaisms within Aeolic. GroupsThe dialects of Classical Antiquity are grouped slightly differently by various authorities. Pamphylian is a marginal dialect of Asia Minor and is sometimes left uncategorized. Note that Mycenaean was only deciphered in 1952, and is therefore missing from the earlier schemes presented here.
Problems of groupingGreek dialects are defined as distinctive collections of linguistic features. The features individually are seldom distinctive, but are shared by different other dialects. Selection of a group is therefore to some degree arbitrary. However, the linguist defining the group usually begins from a geographic range with a center, such as Attic with center Athens. The linguists of the competing divisions all took the reputations and political loyalties of the ancient speakers into consideration; for example, the ancient Greeks themselves recognized a distinction between Dorian and Athenian. To some degree every major city had an identifiable way of speaking. The existence of Greek dialects can be explained by neither the Node Theory nor the Wave Theory alone. Leonard Bloomfield writes of the Node Theory:[5]
In the Node Theory, a parent population, or node, speaking an ancestor to all subsequent dialects, is presumed to have existed and sometimes is attested. The node for the Greek dialects would have been Proto-Greek, but it is reconstructive only. The strongest candidates for the Node Theory are East Greek and West Greek, which have anciently recognized different geographical ranges. In the Wave Theory, defined by Johannes Schmidt in 1872[6],
Most of the individual features are isoglosses; that is, a map of only one feature crosses more than one nodal range. The linguists were therefore free to define the collection of isoglosses that seemed best to fit the ancient groups of speakers according to their own documents and beliefs. Sound changes leading to dialectizationThe ancient Greek dialects were primarily phonemic and vocalic; that is, the dialects were recognized mainly by differences in vowels. These differences occurred as a result of the loss of intervocalic s, consonantal i and w from Proto-Greek. Such a loss brought two vocalic phonemes into juxtaposition, a circumstance often called "collision of vowels".[7] For unknown reasons Greek speakers regarded two vowels together as some sort of impropriety and over time changed pronunciation to avoid it. The way in which they changed determined the dialect. For example, the word for the god of the sea (regardless of the culture and language from which it came) was in some prehistoric form Poseidāwōn, genitive Poseidāwonos, dative Poseidāwoni, etc. Loss of the intervocalic w left Poseidāōn, which is found in both Mycenaean and epic. Ionic changes the a to an e: Poseideōn, while Attic contracts to Poseidōn. Additional dialectization: Corinthian Potedāwoni, becoming Potedāni and Potedān; Boeotian Poteidāoni; Cretan, Rhodian and Delphian Poteidān; Lesbian Poseidān; Arcadian Posoidānos; Laconian Pohoidān. From the dialects it can easily be seen that these isoglosses do not follow any node structure at all. The unconscious object of these changes appears mainly to be the creation of one phoneme from two, a process called "contraction" if a third phoneme is created, or "hyphaeresis" ("taking away") if one phoneme is dropped and the other kept. Sometimes the two phonemes are kept, or are kept and modified, as in the Ionic Poseideōn. Another principle of vocalic dialectization follows the Indo-European ablaut series or vowel grades. Indo-European could interchange e (e-grade) with o (o-grade) or not use either (zero-grade). Similarly Greek inherited the series (for example) ei, oi, i, which are e,-, o- and zero-grades of the diphthong respectively. They could appear in different verb forms: leipo "I leave", leloipa "I have left", elipon "I left", or be used as the basis of dialectization: Attic deiknumi "I point out" but Cretan diknumi. Post-HellenisticThe ancient Greek dialects were a result of isolation and poor communication between communities living in broken terrain. No general Greek historian fails to point out the influence of terrain on the development of the city-states. Often in the development of languages dialectization results in the dissimilation of daughter languages. This phase did not occur in Greek; instead the dialects were replaced by standard Greek. Increasing population and communication brought speakers more closely in touch and united them under the same authorities. Attic Greek became the literary language everywhere. Buck says[8]:
In the first few centuries BCE regional dialects replaced local ones: North-west Greek koine, Doric koine and of course Attic koine. The latter came to replace the others in common speech in the first few centuries AD. After the division of the Roman Empire into east and west the earliest modern Greek prevailed. The dialect distribution was then as follows:
Tsakonian is the only modern Greek dialect that is not descended from Attic or the Koiné. Notes
External linksOverviews
Inscriptions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| firany • Aleksander Jagiellończyk • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |