Double standard.html



When judicial processes are applied more strictly to some people than others, such double standards are seen as just because they violate a basic maxim of modern legal jurisprudence: that all parties should stand equal before the law. Double standards also violate the principle of justice known as impartiality, which is based on the assumption that the same standards should be applied to all people, without regard to subjective bias or favoritism based on social class, rank, ethnicity, gender or other distinction. A double standard violates this principle by holding different people accountable according to different standards.

There is a distinction to be made between double standards and hypocrisy, which implies the stated or presumed acceptance of a single standard a person claims to hold himself or herself accountable to, but which in practice may be disregarded. For example: a man who believes it is his right to have extramarital affairs, but that his wife does not have such a right holds a double standard. A man who publicly condemns extramarital affairs while maintaining his mistress is a hypocrite.

Gender and ethnic double standards

Double standards based upon race are typically termed racism; when the double standard is applied by the minority, the term reverse racism is often used. Double standards that involve gender discrimination are labeled as sexism; historically, the term chivalry has also been used to describe such a double standard.

Look up double standard in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

See also

• Discrimination
• Morality
• Hypocrisy

References

This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes. Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (December 2006)