|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the video game, see Sadness (video game).
For the word sad, see SAD (disambiguation).
Sadness is an emotion characterized by feelings of disadvantage, loss, and helplessness. When sad, people often become quiet, less energetic, and withdrawn. Sadness is considered to be the opposite of happiness, and is similar to the emotions of sorrow, grief, misery, and melancholy. The philosopher Baruch Spinoza defined sadness as the “transfer of a person from a large perfection to a smaller one.” Sadness can be viewed as a temporary lowering of mood (feeling blue), whereas clinical depression is characterized by a persistent and intense lowered mood, as well as disruption to one's ability to function in day to day matters.
Sadness and the accuracy of evaluation
Evidence presented by Forgas (1992, 1994)[1] suggests that our mood has an influence on how accurately we evaluate each other. The effect on our accuracy might be a result of faulty information processing where a person may take his current mood as a source of information. He would then use this biased information as a bases for his evaluation.[2] For instance, happy people are inclined to evaluate others in a positive way, and sad people are inclined to evaluate people in a negative way. Sad people have been found to be less accurate than happy people in their evaluations, as well as taking a longer period of time for the evaluation. [3] Several explanations for this have been postulated:
Sadness and status
Studies have found that when people recognize an expressed emotion, they tend to attribute additional characteristics to the person expressing that emotion (Halo effect). A happy person, therefore is perceived warmly whereas a sad person is perceived as weak and lacking ability[7] and an angry person is perceived as powerful and dominant (Keltner, 1997). Tiedens's [8] study explored whether people provide power to people they like or rather to people they perceive as powerful. The study, which examined social position in political, business and job interview situations, found that people prefer to give status position and power to an angry leader rather than to a sad one. People tend to give power to those perceived as powerful instead of to those whom they like. For example, in the business world, a positive statistical correlation was found between sadness and the extent of a person's social contribution, however angry people were perceived more deserving of status and promotion. Similarly, in the job interviews, angry people were perceived as more suitable for promotion and high salary than sad people. See alsoWikimedia Commons has media related to:
References
Sources
Further reading
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |