User talk:ZayZayEM.html
 
| ca | de | en | es | fr | it | nl | no | pl | pt | ru | ro | fi | sv | tr | vo |


 

Hello ZayZayEM and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!


Contents

Skaven

A step in the right direction! Glad to see someone else working to turn WarHammer articles into somethign other than a plaigarized distilling of the army books!

Intelligent design

Intelligent design has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 21:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

reverts

I'm sorrry that I have found it necessary to make so many reverts. Each one was carefully considered. For example seasonal flu. Google it. You will find that it is a term that is used as a synonym for "human flu". Flu season on the other hand is flu season for other animals as well, birds for example. WAS 4.250 (talk) 10:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Google ≠ wikipedia. The Wikipedia article Flu season makes no mention of non-human influenza seasons. Please take a look at my comments on Talk:Flu season and Talk:Human influenza regarding making the title, topic, and direction articles more clear, appropriate and accurately reflecting their content. Seasonal flu clearly refers to flu occuring in seasonal nature see US gov, Can gov google books etc. --ZayZayEM (talk) 11:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Oh any response to my Skype request? not requiring voicechat, just wordchat. that way we can compare notes on websites in real time and discuss what things are saying and how best to write them to reflect sources and attribute to stakeholders.--ZayZayEM (talk) 11:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force

I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? kilbad (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Not at the moment. My wiki-powers are focused on Influenza related articles.--ZayZayEM (talk) 23:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
I responded to your post at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Dermatology_task_force/Categorization. kilbad (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Don Talbot

Thanks for your help - position is is not strong enough for the article to fight off speedy delete at present - so not worth effort wasting time trying to create it yet. Still searching for documentation. FoolesTroupe (talk)

Requested moves

Hello ZayZayEM. I noticed your two move proposals, but wonder if you can find any backup in our existing policy for the convention you're proposing. WP:MOS seems to regulate everything but the price of tea in China but I couldn't figure out if it had anything to see on names of diseases or viruses. If there's no existing recommended style, it would be helpful to find more examples. Since there is uncertainty, it might be better to relocate these move requests down into the section below, 'Incomplete and contested moves.' EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


That Mucoid Plaque Article

Greetings ZayZayEM. I agree with your arguments on the mucoid plaque talk page. Please take some time to study my recent revision as well as my edit history. I believe I have been able to make some improvements and helpful additions to the article. If you study the talk page you will find that you are not the only skeptic that has complained about the article. Heelop (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Thanks Heelop. I've done some sectioning tweaks on the article.--ZayZayEM (talk) 04:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Be very careful. Heelop is a true believer in this scam, not a scientific skeptic. He has a pretty dubious history here which has gotten him into a bit of hot water, and following his advice and encouragement would be unwise. -- Fyslee / talk 05:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Be very careful. WP:NPA. --ZayZayEM (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Oh I do love Anderon's response to pathologist calling on his quackery

Surgeons and regular doctors are not trained in the subject of mucoid plaque and therefore remain unaware of this important bowel condition.

– Richard Anderson[1]

  • Maybe because doctor's are not routinely trained in fictitious diseases. You'll be surprised they aren't trained about Verucca Nomes either... I also like the idea there is such a thing as an irregular doctor (oh maybe that is what a naturopath is), and yet there are not any irregular surgeons?). --ZayZayEM (talk) 07:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Greetings again ZayZayEM. I'm having problems with one of the editors and I put the neutrality dispute sign back up again. In order to prevent an edit war, can you come and add your two cents? I have explained the problem on the mucoid plaque talk page. Heelop (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Well said.

I really like your quibble in an RfC at Talk:Chiropractic a few weeks ago. Very useful analogy which clarifies the situation quite well.

While scrolling through your contribs to find the diff for the above comment, I notice you've commented at Talk:Mucoid plaque. I've edited that article in the past; maybe I'll go and have a look and see what's happening there. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 00:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Grzyby • Forum dyskusyjne • Grzyby • www.czapka.pikawka.pl • wierszyki milosne • Grzyby • Forum dyskusyjne • Grzyby • Grzyby • czerwona marchewka • Grzyby • Forum dyskusyjne • Grzyby • Grzyby • Grzyby All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog.